Sagging through means of natural selection

 In nature, only the strong survive. Evolution pushes the idea of the survival of the fittest.
 From birth, we can conclude that the sperm that fertilized the egg is the sperm that was meant to fertilize the egg.
 You are original and unique, and yet not that original or unique because certain commonalities had to be developed through natural selection.
 So in essence I'm saying, we are not all that different.
 That brings me to a recent conversation among some friends. They wondered why certain young men sag, and how women can find it appealing.
 If evolution has done its duty, then how have saggers developed into a second or third generational trend?
If saggers do not have a place in society, why would something that was not developed in my generation continue into this generation?
Well, simply put, we are not all that different.
Saggers and non-saggers have a commonality. Survival.
As we all know, you can participate in the mating process without intending to create new life, and yet it still applies that through the process of natural selection, women choose a male to participate in the mating process with, consciously or subconsciously, that has desirable traits. Strength and ability to take care of the women are generally on the list of desirables.
Since we have determined that we are not all that different, we can conclude that an individual sagger has a common desirable trait that makes the whole group desirable for mating.
Let's take a look at the appearance of the group known as saggers. Saggers are not found in corporate America, yet their appearance is generally trendy, stylish, swaggy. Saggers can be found on college campuses, but are not seen among the hat-tossers at graduation.
It has been said that historically sagging began in prison, where truly only the strong survive, and yet generations that have never seen a jail cell have caught on to the trend.
So maybe this trend has moved past its defining moment, and we should focus on the commonality and the future of the trend rather than the past.
Thus we have determined that saggers are not the most wealthy, are a bit stylish and may misbehave, but have not been to jail so cannot be deemed criminals. They are also somewhat uneducated or immature in intellect since saggers come to college but graduate past the trend.
So, a bit radically, I purpose that women choose men based upon that appearance while recognizing that there is a physical commonality linking these men. It can be seen through the pants and that is why sagging is the linking factor.
This commonality helps a woman have a better chance of having a child. Just as a man recognizes the hips of a woman, women have a way of searching for the correct package to supply the necessary goods to create life.
This is survival of the fittest through natural selection.
Now, by no means do I condone sagging nor am I attracted to it. But, I must say, as long as this physical commonality is recognizable in a sagger, we will see sagging.
Think about it.
You cannot argue with natural selection. It is how you got here.